The v1 form of the 📝Resonance Share Agreement — the self-serve instrument that replaced the 90-minute consult of 📝RSA // v0. A Citizen composed their own agreement by answering it, and the results were published together in 📝Citizen RSAs. Question copy below is verbatim from the response export; part groupings and numbering are reconstructed from field order, since the export preserves questions but not section headings, and follow the convention of the 📝Immigration Form.
Part 1. Information About You
- 1a. What is your first name?
- 1b. What is your last name?
- 1c. What are your pronouns?
- Values present in responses: He/Him, She/Hers, Them/Theirs, We/Ours, and Other as free text
- 1d. What is your Citizen email address?
- 1e. Who referred you here? (optional)
Part 2. Alignment of Frames
Nine gates. Each states a frame, then asks for consent to it.
- 2a. A 📝frame is a lens through which one views reality. Frames are commonly called perspectives, paradigms, etc.
We co-create, elevate, and gift frames amongst Citizens
Are you open to receiving new frames?
- 2b. One frame We use most often within the cooperative is that of 📝co-creativity, or joint creativity, which invites individuals to reveal their true nature by contributing aspects of themselves, rather than talk about them.
We believe that We can better understand each other by creating together.
Will you co-create with Us?
- 2c. Co-creativity is a form of 📝play.
To be serious is to press for a specified conclusion.
To be playful is to allow for possibility.
Citizens of One are committed to play.
Can We begin with play?
- 2d. Finite games are played for the purpose of winning.
📝Infinite games are played for the purpose of continuing play.
Capitalism is a finite game.
Cooperatives are infinite games.
Do you align with this frame?
- 2e. As a co-created living system making space for infinite play, much of One Inc Cooperative is deliberately incomplete.
Will you accept "we don't know" as an answer?
- 2f. While present day legal contracts have merit in certain situations, We believe that their overuse has flattened our ability to interrelate by creating undue expectations.
We choose to first cultivate agreements.
An agreement is a harmony of intentions. It is a 📝living entity and must be cared for consciously in order to thrive.
Do you agree to cultivate agreements?
- 2g. Do you 📝consent to governance of our agreements in alignment with the 📝Agreements of One?
- 2h. Do you understand how to invoke our 📝Safe Words?
- 2i. Do you acknowledge multiple 📝Types of Capital?
Part 3. Objectives
Six horizons, all free text. This part is the Objectives section that v0 left as [ SEE: CITIZEN RSA ], moved into the Citizen's own hands.
- 3a. What is one small thing you'd like to achieve within the next 1 month? Be as vague or specific as you'd like.
- 3b. What is one medium thing you'd like to achieve within the next 3 months? Be as vague or specific as you'd like.
- 3c. What is one large thing you'd like to achieve within the next 11 months? Be as vague or specific as you'd like.
- 3d. What is one thing you'd like to achieve for yourself in your lifetime? Be as vague or specific as you'd like.
- 3e. What is one thing you'd like to achieve for the world in your lifetime? Be as vague or specific as you'd like.
- 3f. What is one thing you'd like to achieve for 📝the Self in your lifetime? Be as vague or specific as you'd like.
Part 4. Exchange of Capital
Two multi-selects over the same six types of capital — one for what the Citizen sought, one for what they offered — each followed by the same free-text elaboration. The export carries the option labels but not the two block prompts; the sought-then-offered reading comes from the free text filed under each.
- 4a. Capital sought (multi-select)
- 💰 Financial Capital; purchases, sponsorships, investments, etc.
- ⏳ Natural Capital; physical work, intellectual/creative labors, etc.
- 🧠 Intellectual Capital; knowledge, insight, experience, etc.
- 🗣 Social Capital; advocacy, alignment, awareness, etc.
- 🎨 Cultural Capital; artistic representation, parody, etc.
- 🧘♂️ Spiritual Capital; attention, presence, ineffable energies, etc.
- 4b. Tell us more about this.
- 4c. Capital offered (multi-select, same six options)
- 4d. Tell us more about this.
Part 5. General Resonance
- 5a. Is there anything else you'd like to share?
Response Corpus
- 88 completed responses spanning 2020-04-30 to 2023-05-10. 81% arrived in 2020 and 42% in May 2020 alone; from 2021 the form ran at one to four responses per quarter.
- Median completion time was 18.7 minutes start to submit, with quartiles at 10.5 and 36.7 — longer than the 11 minutes recorded on the parent memo, though idle time is inside the measurement.
- Every gate in Part 2 passed. 88 of 88 on agreements, Agreements of One, Safe Words, and Types of Capital; 87 of 88 on frames, co-creativity, and play; 85 of 87 on infinite games; 73 of 77 on "we don't know."
- 83 respondents chose a listed pronoun; 5 wrote their own.
- 36 named a referrer, roughly half of them Brian by name. The rest name individual Citizens, a Topia party, and Reddit.
- Objectives were answered in full — all six — by 75 of the 77 respondents who saw the block.
- Capital sought, by count: Intellectual 75, Spiritual 71, Social 67, Financial 62, Cultural 56, Natural 53.
- Capital offered, by count: Intellectual 82, Spiritual 76, Natural 72, Social 67, Cultural 59, Financial 37.
- The median respondent selected five of the six types in each direction. Financial is the only type where offered falls well below sought.
Revisions in the Field
The instrument changed once, three days after launch. The first eleven responses, submitted 2020-04-30 through 2020-05-02, carry no answer to 2e and none of the six Objectives in Part 3. Both were added between 04:09 and 22:13 UTC on 2020-05-02, and every response after that carries them.
Reflections
Part 2 rejected no one. Every respondent who reached the end consented to everything material, and the one who answered no to two frames finished anyway — there was no branch to stop them. The nine gates worked as liturgy rather than filter: they set the register a Citizen would be speaking in, and the information the agreement actually needed came from Parts 3 and 4. The revision history says the same thing from the other side. What launched was a consent instrument, and the Objectives block — the part that makes an RSA an agreement about something rather than an assent to a worldview — was not in it.