Skip to main content
Mythos

Product Requirements Document (PRD) is a product-management artifact that defines what a product or feature must do and why — the 📝problem, the intended users, the requirements, and the 📝success criteria — before a team builds it.

A PRD typically covers a problem statement, target users, goals and explicit non-goals, functional requirements, constraints, and measurable success metrics. It deliberately describes the what and the why while leaving the how — architecture and implementation — to engineering design documents. The document serves as the shared contract between product, design, and engineering: disagreements surface in review of the PRD, where changing course costs a conversation, rather than mid-build, where it costs a rewrite.

Practice varies widely. Heavyweight PRDs descend from waterfall-era requirements engineering; agile teams often shrink the form to one-pagers or replace it with user stories and continuous discovery, and 📝Amazon's "working backwards" PR/FAQ is a well-known alternative that opens with the imagined press release instead of the requirements list. The form has recently found a second audience: AI coding agents consume PRD-shaped specs directly, and a precise statement of requirements up front is one of the more reliable ways to keep an autonomous build on target.

Writing the spec before any non-trivial build is a standing rule in my workflow — ambiguity you resolve in the document is ambiguity an agent never has to guess at. The PRD pattern survives in my agent workflows even where the formal document doesn't.

Created with 💜 by One Inc | Copyright 2026