Skip to main content
Mythos

AI UX Design is the discipline of shaping how users interact with 📝Artificial Intelligence (AI)—translating raw model capabilities into intuitive, accessible, and contextually intelligent experiences. In practice, it defines whether AI feels like a tool, a partner, or a wall. Historically, 📝User Experience (UX) design has lagged behind breakthroughs in AI model development: while model performance improves rapidly, the interfaces through which we access that power often remain unintuitive, overly technical, or confined to outdated metaphors like command-line prompts and chatbots.

This disconnect is the central theme of a recent talk by Alan Pike, co-founder of Forestwalk Labs, delivered at the Vancouver AI Community Meetup. Pike illustrates how many AI interfaces remain stuck in what he calls the “DOS era of AI”—text fields and scrolling transcripts—despite the leap in capability represented by models like 📝ChatGPT. He highlights emerging 📝Post-Chat Interface Paradigms: right-click contextual actions, natural-language filters, invisible assistants that tidy design files, and predictive design suggestions based on user behavior. His core assertion: what feels delightful and futuristic today will become tomorrow’s expectation—and fast. The talk offers a compelling case that designing modern AI experiences means moving beyond the novelty of the model, and into the ergonomics of interaction.

📝Christian Knudsen sent me Alan's talk (embedded below), and I’m grateful he did. It hit a precise nerve I’ve been twitching at for months: the aesthetic and experiential gap between model capability and user interface. I’ve often felt that the “magic” of AI gets buried under clunky wrappers and generic UI metaphors, where the power of the model feels hidden behind a terminal window—or worse, a chatbot with amnesia.

Alan named this with clarity and momentum: what is delightful today will be table stakes tomorrow. And it echoes a core frustration I’ve held: that we’re still designing as if AI is the assistant, when really it’s the co-creator—and co-creators need better tools to shape flow in real time.

One standout moment: his vision of spellcheck evolving into a “devil’s advocate,” offering critiques like “cite your sources,” or “why is this so complicated?” That’s exactly the spirit behind Spiritual Bro—an AI designed not just to elevate your language, but to elevate your life. It’s not about correction. It’s about reflection. And that design ethos—where critique is an act of care—feels like the frontier we’re all building toward.

Contexts

Created with 💜 by One Inc | Copyright 2026